
They just can’t leave it alone, can they?
I was flabbergasted to read in the Midlands section of this past Friday’s Omaha World-Herald about two bills being proposed in the Nebraska Legislature- bills that stem from the results of America’s most recent presidential election.
First of all, this state’s legislature- the only unicameral (one chamber) legislature in the United States- is billed as nonpartisan. If you’ve lived in this state long enough, you know that such a claim ranks right up there with a couple of longstanding myths…namely the one that we fight wars to bring about peace and the myth about how smoking calms your nerves.
As it’s currently comprised, Nebraska’s legislature is heavily Republican. In fact, the same state that gave the world Dan Whitney (AKA Larry the Cable Guy) is one of America’s most heavily Republican states.
And State Sens. Beau McCoy (of Omaha) and Mark Christensen (he’s from the town of Imperial, way down in the southwest corner of the state) are out to keep Nebraska that way.
Last week, McCoy introduced Legislative Bill (LB) 21, a measure designed to bring Nebraska back to a “winner-take-all” system of allocating electoral votes in a presidential election. (Right now, the only other state where a candidate who wins the popular vote isn’t assured of getting all its electoral votes is Maine.)
Nebraska abandoned the “winner-take-all” system in 1991. Its state senators voted to go to a method where two of the Cornhusker State’s five electoral votes go to the candidate who won the most popular votes, while one vote gets awarded from each of the state’s three US House districts.
Hardly any lawmakers here had any beefs about the state’s current electoral allocation system…until, in 2008, Barack Obama picked up one of Nebraska’s five electoral votes, preventing John McCain from putting all five of them in his own hip pocket.
Ever since then, many of Nebraska’s Republican figures have been fuming about it all…and screaming for a return to the WTA system.
The fuming’s going to continue, now that McCoy’s bill couldn’t make it out of the Unicameral’s Government, Military, and Veterans Affairs Committee (thanks to its members reaching a 4-4 vote on whether to advance LB 21).
And yep, McCoy wants to bring it back up next year.
Business executive McCoy and his fellow Elephants say that Nebraska’s electoral allocation system divides the state’s urban and rural areas (as if they’re not already divided!) and cuts the state’s overall influence in presidential elections…while the Democrats in the legislature say that the current method gives more candidates (especially the Donkeys) more of an incentive to stump here.
McCoy (he’s a first-term state senator) brought the bill up because he’s afraid the state that brought William Jennings Bryan into the world won’t be relevant anymore…especially if the results of the 2020 Census show that the first state to be admitted to the Union after this country’s Civil War ended will have to give up a representative, leaving it with four electoral votes.
And then you’ve got Christensen, who cooked up LB 654. [He's the same man who wants teachers and school administrators to start packing heat, in light of a shooting that took place here in Omaha five days into 2011. Maybe you heard of Robert Butler Jr., the Omaha student who picked off his school's (Millard South High) vice principal (Vicky Kaspar) and tried to kill its principal (Curtis Case) before Butler bumped himself off.]
Anyway, LB 654 is designed to make presidential and vice-presidential candidates show long-form proof that not only were they born here in the United States of America…but also that each of their parents were born here in the Land of the Big Mac, too.
I get the feeling that, later this year, US Rep. Jeff Fortenberry will be eating dinner with Christensen and McCoy.
And I get the feeling that Christensen (a rancher by trade) wouldn’t have asked for this kind of legislation if McCain had been able to keep 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in GOP hands. (Remember, the senior US senator from Arizona was born in the Panama Canal Zone…to American-born parents, one of them a high-ranking Naval officer. And, at the time, the Canal Zone was a US possession. After all, McCain was born in 1936…64 years before the Panama Canal was turned over to the country where it was built.)
Beau McCoy, Mark Christensen, and their many, many supporters seem to constantly ignore one simple fact:
Nobody ever asked to be born…and we can’t help the places where we were born.
I hope neither of these LBs makes it out of committee…let alone become law.
They both strike me as sour grapes.
It’s also funny how, when Arnold Schwarzenegger became California’s governor in 2003, some Republicans were licking their chops over how Hollywood’s Terminator would look giving speeches from the Oval Office. I remember US Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) championing an amendment that would change the US Constitution to allow foreign-born Americans who’d put in at least twenty years of citizenship here in the country that gave us rock and roll to make their own White House bids.
Think Christensen, Fortenberry, and McCoy would’ve broken their necks to get such an amendment ratified?
Speaking of think…I don’t know what an earlier US senator, George Norris, would’ve thought of LBs 654 and 21. Norris was the man who was the biggest advocate of stripping his home state of its House of Representatives.
And that as a measure for Nebraska- a state Norris served with distinction- to get through the Great Depression.
Maybe if the Cornhusker State could get back to having a bicameral legislature, better laws could get proposed.
And proposals such as LB 21 and LB 654 would have an extra filter to have to go through.
These two would-be laws were designed to invalidate a presidency…and designed to invalidate votes.
All in the name of politics.



